|
This
page has been updated to include the data that became available in 2007.
A
model's Reliability Percentrank is a ranking of that model's Reliability Score
relative to all other Reliability Scores for the given model year and age range.
The percentrank was computed using the Percentrank function of Microsoft's Excel
2002 and, as the first part of the compound word percentrank suggests,
is a value between 0.00 and 1.00. If a model's Reliability Percentrank is near
0.00, it has a very low Reliability Score, and if a Percentrank is near 1.00, it
has a high Reliability Score. For a more detailed explanation of Reliability
Percentranks and Reliability Scores, click
here to be taken to the Methodology page.
Note
that Reliability Percentranks for model year 2004 are based on one year of data.
Consequently, the Reliability Percentranks for individual models of that year are more
subject to statistical fluctuation. These early data have been provided as several
visitors have expressed interest in more current Percentranks; however, a better
guide to the reliability of a new model are likely the five-year averages.

To
view charts of the Reliability Percentrank averages for the Saab line and an
extrapolation of these averages to
2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and
2012, and
an individual chart
of the Reliability Percentranks for one of the
models of the Saab line and an
extrapolation of these Reliability Percentranks to
2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009,
click here.
To view charts and tables
regarding the 2007 Reliability-Durability Updates,
click here.
Advisory:
Saab is a division of General Motors Corporation.
|
Charts of 2008 Reliability Predictions |
|
(Each chart is linked to a news article providing additional
information.) |




|
Links to Articles on 2008 Reliability
Ratings, Other Quality Measures, and A Top Pick |
|
(Each image is linked to a news article providing additional
information.) |
|
2007 Charts of GM's Reliability Grades for Model Years
1999-2004 |
|
(Each chart is linked to a news article providing additional
information.) |



|
Some Additional
Charts and Tables Pertaining to Reliability, Durability and Other Quality
Measures |
|
(Each chart is linked to a news article providing additional
information.) |






 




|
Table I: Number and Percentage
of Entries in CR's 2007
Much-Worse-Than-Average List, by Manufacturer |
|
Auto Manufacturer |
Number of Entries |
Percent of Entires |
|
General Motors Corporation |
14 |
36.8% |
|
DaimlerChrysler AG |
7* |
18.4% |
|
Ford Motor Company |
6** |
15.8% |
|
Volkswagen AG |
5 |
13.2% |
|
Nissan Motor
Company |
3 |
7.9% |
|
BMW AG |
2 |
5.3% |
|
Kia Motors
Corporation |
1 |
2.6% |
|
All Others |
0 |
0% |
|
*
Three are from DaimlerChrysler's North American Chrysler group and
four are from the Mercedes-Benz division. |
|
**
Two are from Ford's North American group, two are from the
Jaguar division, one is from the Land Rover division, and one is
from the Volvo division. |
|
Source: "CR Bad Bets," Consumer Reports,
April 2007, p. 81 |
Moody's Ratings of General Motors Corporation's Unsecured Long-Term Debt |
|
Investment Grade Ratings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baa1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baa2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baa3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junk Grade
Ratings |
|
Ba1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ba2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ba3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caa1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caa2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caa3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
05 |
06 |
07 |
08 |
09 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
05 |
06 |
|
|
2005 |
2006 |
Some Saab-related news articles:
|
March 2008: GM's CEO Gets Pay Raise to $2.2 Million, But Doesn't Such a Talented Fellow Deserve $22 Million? Or $220 Million? |
|
March 2008: Chevrolet Upholds and Expands a Tradition in Infamy: GM's Chevrolet Line Worst by CR's 2008 Used Cars to Avoid |
|
March 2008: GM Expands Lead on CR's Used-Cars-to-Avoid List, Sets Record Share for Recent Years |
|
January 2008: By CR's 10-Year Reliability-Verdict History, Hyundai Clobbers GM Once Again: Is General Motors in Overdrive to Become the World's Worst Automobile Manufacturer? |
|
December 2007: In the
Race to Quality and Out of GM Products, Aussies Hold Lead, Mexicans Closing Fast, Americans May Finish Last |
|
October 2007:
By CR's Predicted Short-Term Reliability for 2008 Cars and Trucks, Reliable Two Models Account for 24 of 38 Most Reliable and Big Three Account for 20 of 42 Least Reliable; Hyundai Once Again Trounces GM |
|
October 2007: By CR's Predicted Short-Term Reliability Scores for Model Year 2008, Toyota and Honda Marques Gather 5 of 6 Best, GM Marques Gather 3 of 7 Worst, 5 of 9 Worst and 7 of 13 Worst: Is GM on a Quest to Be Junk's Absolute Monarch? |
|
August 2007: The 2007 Reliability-Durability Updates: For Vehicles 3-to-5 Years Old, Toyota and Honda Account for 18 of 19 Best, GM - 24 of 61 Worst |
|
July 2007: The 2007 Reliability-Durability Updates: For Vehicles 4-to-6 Years Old, Toyota and Honda Account for 17 of 17 Best, GM - 24 of 56 Worst: Will a Typical Toyota at 13 Years of Age Be as Troublesome as a Typical GM at 3 Years of Age? |
|
July 2007: The 2007 Reliability-Durability Updates: For Vehicles 5-to-7 Years Old, Toyota and Honda Account for 12 of 13 Best, GM - 19 of 48 Worst: Will a Typical Toyota at 21 Years of Age Be as Troublesome as a Typical GM at 3 Years of Age? |
| |