¹Current data are insufficient to warrant charts.

This page has been updated to include the data that became available in 2007.

A model's Reliability Percentrank is a ranking of that model's Reliability Score relative to all other Reliability Scores for the given model year and age range. The percentrank was computed using the Percentrank function of Microsoft's Excel 2002 and, as the first part of the compound word percentrank suggests, is a value between 0.00 and 1.00. If a model's Reliability Percentrank is near 0.00, it has a very low Reliability Score, and if a Percentrank is near 1.00, it has a high Reliability Score. For a more detailed explanation of Reliability Percentranks and Reliability Scores, click here to be taken to the Methodology page.

Note that Reliability Percentranks for model year 2004 are based on one year of data. Consequently, the Reliability Percentranks for individual models of that year are more subject to statistical fluctuation. These early data have been provided as several visitors have expressed interest in more current Percentranks; however, a better guide to the reliability of a new model are likely the five-year averages.

To view a chart of the Reliability Percentrank averages for the Plymouth line and individual charts of the Reliability Percentranks for three of the models of the Plymouth line, click here.

Advisory: Plymouth is a defunct division of the Chrysler Group of DaimlerChrysler AG.

Plymouth-related news articles:

July 2007: The 2007 Reliability-Durability Updates: For Vehicles 7-to-9 Years Old, Toyota and Honda Account for 11 of 12 Best, GM - 22 of 41 Worst: Will a Typical Toyota at 30 Years of Age Be as Troublesome as a Typical GM at 3 Years of Age?

May 2007: DaimlerChrysler Jettisons Chrysler; Cerberus Does Salvage; Where to from Here?

May 2007: Toyota Reliability Drops Some, But Toyota-GM Gap Remains Near Record

April 2007: The Best Models by CR's 2007 History of Reliability Verdicts: The Reliable Two Shine; Big Three Score Zip

March 2007: GM Expands Lead on CR's Used-Cars-to-Avoid List, a Tad

March 2006: U.S. Recalls Involving (1) 1999-2000 Chrysler Cirrus, Dodge Stratus, and Plymouth Breeze Sedans, (2) 2006 Honda Civics, (3) 2006 F-150 and Lincoln Mark LT Pickups, (4) 2006 Dodge Dakota, Dodge Ram, and Mitsubishi Raider Pickups, (5) 2003-2006 Nissan Murano SUVs, (6) 2005-2006 Porsche 911 Carrera S and Carrera S Cabriolet, (7) 2003 Audi A4s and A6s, and (8) 2000-2003 Dodge Dakota Pickups, 1997-2001 Jeep Cherokee SUVs, and 1997-2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Wrangler SUVs

February 2006: General Motors and DaimlerChrysler Again Dominate CR's Used-Cars-to-Avoid List

August 2005: For Vehicles 6-to-8 Years Old, Toyota Garners 7 of Top 10 Reliability Percentranks, General Motors Gathers 23 of Lowest 36

June 2005: DaimlerChrysler Gets Reduction in Punitive Damages for Manufacturing Collapsing Front Seats

June 2005: NHTSA Ratchets Up Investigation of Chrysler Minivans for Headlight Failure, Opens Investigation on Ford Expedition for Windshield Leak

May 2005: Toyota-Big Three Quality Gap Huge, and Growing

February 2005: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Commences Investigations of Mercedes-Benz's M-Class SUV and Chrysler's Minivans

Automotive News Menu Pages

Auto Manufacturers: Toyota - Honda - Subaru - Nissan - Ford - Chrysler - General Motors - Volkswagen

Topics: Reviews - Recalls - Safety Investigations - Safety Test Results - Automotive Excellence - Green and Clean - Automotive Dishonor, Discredit, or Demerit - Lawsuits - Automotive Finances - Car and Truck Sales and Market Shares - Auto on Info

The visitor may find the following tables and charts useful as well.

Median Value of a New Big Three Vehicle as Assessed by Mini-Survey Respondents Reporting Ownership of a Quality Four Product on or before July 8, 2005, by Manufacturer
Manufacturer	Big 3 Vehicle Valued at More Than What Is Currently Asked	Big 3 Vehicle Valued at What Is Currently Asked	Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Only 95% of What Is Currently Asked	Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Only 80% of What Is Currently Asked	Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Only 50% of What Is Currently Asked	Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Nothing	Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Nothing Plus Respondent Would Require $20,000+ per Year to Drive It	Big 3 Vehicle Valued at Nothing Plus Respondent Would Require $200,000+ per Year to Drive It	Respondent Unwilling to Own a Big Three Vehicle under Any Circumstance
Toyota Motor Corporation								√
Honda Motor Company						√
Subaru Division of Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd.1							√
Nissan Motor Company1				√
1 Very few respondents reported owning a product by Nissan or Subaru.
The Big Three manufacturers are General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and the Chrysler Group of DaimlerChrysler AG. See Glossary.
To view more results or to express your assessment of the value of a new Big Three Vehicle, go to Mini-Survey No. 31, "The True Value of a Big Three."