Bookmarking Auto on Info pagesSupporting Auto on InfoHome or Site Layout or Site Map or Site Index or Quick Jumps or Search Engine Directory or The Mart or The LinksMini-Survey Menu PageMini-Survey No. 58: A Toyota Owner Survey with Enquiries into Reliability Importance

Links to the Mart		Links to the Mart
Equipping the Expedition Dressing Up for the Trip		Earrings for an Evening Out Books Purchased by Visitors
Visitor support makes this site possible. Please shop often at Amazon.com via Auto on Info. Thank you.

A Toyota Owner Survey with Enquiries into Reliability Importance

Queries

The queries for this mini-survey are:

Responses as of February 10, 2008

Query 1. The reported importance that reliability was in respondent's decision to purchase a Toyota vehicle, for all respondents.

0

2

4

6

8

Unimportant

Extremely Important

Query 2. Respondent's assessment of the percentage of the total quality gap between his/her vehicle and a typical Big Three that the reliability difference accounts for, for all respondents.

0% to 5%

5% to 20%

20% to 40%

40+%

Reliability-Percentrank and Reliability-Grade Tables and Charts
To view tables of Reliability Percentranks and Reliability Grades by vehicle type, click the applicable type.
Small Cars	Sports Cars, Sporty Cars and Coupes	Family Cars and Large Cars	Upscale and Luxury Cars	SUVs	Minivans	Pickups	Manufacturer Averages	All Autos
To view tables of Reliability Percentranks and Reliability Grades by vehicle line, click the applicable line.
Acura	Audi	BMW	Buick	Cadillac	Chevrolet	Chrysler	Dodge	Eagle
Ford	GMC	Honda	Hyundai	Infiniti	Isuzu	Jaguar	Jeep	Kia
Land Rover	Lexus	Lincoln	Mazda	Mercedes-Benz	Mercury	Mini Cooper	Mitsubishi	Nissan
Oldsmobile	Plymouth	Pontiac	Porsche	Saab	Saturn	Scion	Subaru	Suzuki
Toyota	Volkswagen	Volvo
Beginning with the 2007 updates, the Reliability Grades and Reliability Percentranks of motor vehicle lines and types will appear on the same page. This should quicken comparisons.
To view charts of Reliability Percentrank averages and Percentranks and extrapolations, click the applicable line.
Acura	Audi	BMW	Buick	Cadillac	Chevrolet	Chrysler	Dodge	Eagle
Ford	GMC	Honda	Hyundai	Infiniti	Isuzu	Jaguar	Jeep	Kia1
Land Rover	Lexus	Lincoln	Mazda	Mercedes-Benz	Mercury	Mini Cooper1	Mitsubishi1	Nissan
Oldsmobile	Plymouth	Pontiac	Porsche1	Saab	Saturn	Scion1	Subaru	Suzuki1
Toyota	Volkswagen	Volvo
1Current data are insufficient to warrant charts.
To view tables of the Best and Worst motor vehicle models, click the applicable year.
Best and Worst of 1988	Best and Worst of 1989	Best and Worst of 1990	Best and Worst of 1991	Best and Worst of 1992	Best and Worst of 1993	Best and Worst of 1994	Best and Worst of 1995	Best and Worst of 1996
Best and Worst of 1997	Best and Worst of 1998	Best and Worst of 1999	Best and Worst of 2000	Best and Worst of 2001	Best and Worst of 2002	Best and Worst of 2003	Best and Worst of 2004	Summary
Chart Summary of 2006 Updates	Chart and Table Summary of 2007 Updates	Chart and Table Summary of 2008 Updates
Charts of Gaps
Charts of the Great Gaps	Extrapolations of the Great Gaps
Durability Tables and Charts
Page 1 - Original Durability Page	Page 2 - Results of 2001 Survey	Page 3 - CCC's 15 Most Frequently Stolen	Page 4 - 2001 Summary of Rosters	Page 5 - Top 20 High Mileage	Page 6 - The 2006 Study of Model Year 1998	Page 7 - The 2006 Toyota Age Equivalents for Model Year 1998	Page 8 - The 2006 Honda Age Equivalents for Model Year 1998	Page 9 - The 2007 Dilapidation Rates for Model Years 1998 - 2002
Page 10 - The 2007 Study of Model Year 1999	Page 11 - The 2007 Toyota Age Equivalents for Model Year 1999	Page 12 - The 2007 Honda Age Equivalents for Model Year 1999	Page 13 - 2007 Pickup Durability Updates for Model Years 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001	Roster of 300,000-Mile Vehicles with Statistical Summary	Mini-Survey No. 52: A Toyota Owner Satisfaction Poll with Enquiries into Toyota Durability

Search Engine Directory
This table is provided primarily to give the visitor quick access to those search engines that site manager has found to be more consistently useful for information acquisition. For descriptions, strengths, weaknesses, comments, and other names and formats by which the following search engines are known, go to Search Engine Directory Page.
Major Search and Metasearch Engines
Exalead	Yahoo!	Ask.com	Info.com	DMOZ	Google
Site manager estimates that the Exalead search engine is presently 30 to 35 times better than Google, but is only 8% as good as Google was prior to the advent of large expenditures on internet advertising by the major automobile manufacturers.	Site manager estimates that the Yahoo search engine is presently 15 to 20 times better than Google, but is only 7% as good as Google was prior to the advent of large expenditures on internet advertising by the major automobile manufacturers.	Site manager estimates that the Ask search engine is presently 5 to 10 times better than Google, but is only 6% as good as Google was prior to the advent of large expenditures on internet advertising by the major automobile manufacturers.	Info is a metasearch engine that scans 14 search engines for results. Metasearch engines are modestly successful in weeding out the junk within the first 10 entries of a search results page, but is, of course, of no help in inserting what is missing.	DMOZ is the product of thousands of volunteers who select out the better sites that the web has to offer; consequently, there is an assurance of greater quality than the mean of what a search engine offers within the first 10 results of a phrase search.	At Google, a web page of a dominant information provider may not appear in the first 1,000 entries, maybe the first 10,000 entries, of an applicable phrase search, at least since the advent of significant internet advertising.
The Ixquick Metasearch Engine
Auto on Info Metasearch at ixquick Keywords: